Chamberlain NR361 Week 7 Discussion Latest 2024

NR361 RN Information Systems in Healthcare

Week 7 Discussion

Quality and Safety in Healthcare Informatics

Purpose

The purpose of this discussion is to explore the importance of quality and safety in healthcare informatics.

Course Outcomes

This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 4: Describe evidence-based safety, quality, and decision-making support tools embedded in information and communication technologies. (POs 4, 8)

Due Date

Graded discussions in Weeks 1-7 are due Sunday at 11:59 pm MT. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the discussion will close on Saturday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All Week 8 discussion requirements must be met by this deadline.

Total Points Possible

This discussion is worth a total of 100 points.

Preparing the Discussion

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the discussion. Abide by Chamberlain University's academic integrity policy. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Directions

 Discussion: Apply Knowledge

Step 1: Watch the Patient Safety Movement videoLinks to an external site..

Step 2: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail.

Paragraph one: Discuss one quality and safety issue you observed while watching the video and explain the impact of this issue.

Paragraph two: Discuss how the role of technology helped or hindered the quality and safety issue you identified.

Paragraph three: Discuss one information and communication technology policy that should be enacted to prevent the selected quality and safety issue.

References: Provide complete references for all citations.

Posts should meet the following criteria:

Integrate Evidence: Cite at least two sources of evidence in weekly posts.

Integrate evidence from assigned reading(s) OR lesson.

Integrate evidence from at least one outside scholarly source as directed in the discussion directions.

Integrate evidence that supports the discussion.

Cite all scholarly sources, reading(s) OR lessons in an in-text citation within the post and include a complete reference at the bottom of the post.

Use sources no more than five years old unless they are historical references.

Engage in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage with peers and/or faculty by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.

Respond to a peer and/or faculty post.

Provide additional information or clarification in the reply post.

Add depth to the discussion.

Communicate Professionally: Communicate professionally on all posts.

Communicate clearly and concisely.

Communicate respectfully, civilly, and caringly.

Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.

Participate: Participate during the assigned week. You are expected to meet the minimum participation requirement described below. You will receive a 10% point deduction in a graded discussion if you do not post at least two (2) times on at least two (2) different days during the assigned week.

Post in the discussion at least two times.

Post in the discussion on two different days.

Grading

To view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion board title and then Show Rubric.