Norwich NR593 Week 8 Assignment Latest 2021 March

Question # 00622733
Course Code : NR593
Subject: Health Care
Due on: 03/26/2021
Posted On: 03/26/2021 04:43 AM
Tutorials: 1
Rating:
4.9/5
Question Dot Image

NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice

Week 8 Assignment  

Qualitative Research Article Critique

The Instructor will supply the student with a qualitative research article to critique.

This critique will be in APA format with a Title page, Reference page, and Level Headings separating the sections in the body of your paper. You will begin with an introduction. The body of your paper will answer the critiquing questions that are found in the Complete Qualitative Assignment Instructions. You will end the paper with a conclusion and a reference page.

ASPECT OF THE REPORT                CRITIQUING QUESTIONS

TITLE      ?             Is the title a good one, suggesting the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?

ABSTRACT           ?             Does the abstract clearly and concisely summarize the main features of the report?

INTRODUCTION

Statement of the problem          

?             Was the problem stated unambiguously and is it easy to identify?

?             Did the problem statement build a cogent and persuasive argument for the new study?

?             Was the problem significant for nursing?

?             Was there a good match between the research problem on the one hand and the paradigm, tradition, and methods on the other—that is, was a qualitative approach appropriate?

Research questions        ?             Were research questions explicitly stated? If not, was their absence justified?

?             Were the questions consistent with the study’s philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideologic orientation?

Literature review             ?             Did the report adequately summarize the existing body of knowledge related to the problem or phenomenon of interest?

?             Did the literature review provide a strong basis for the new study?

Conceptual underpinnings           ?             Were key concepts adequately defined conceptually?

?             Was the philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideologic orientation made explicit and was it appropriate for the problem?

METHOD

Protection of participants’ rights              

?             Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants?

?             Was the study subject to external review by an IRB or ethics review board?

?             Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?

Research design and research tradition

?             Was the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data?

?             Was an adequate amount of time spent with study participants?

?             Did the design unfold during data collection, giving researchers opportunities to capitalize on early understandings?

?             Was there an adequate number of contacts with study participants?

Sample and setting         ?             Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?

?             Was the approach used to recruit participants or gain access to the site productive and appropriate?

?             Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study?

?             Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved?

Data collection  ?             Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?

?             Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations, and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?

?             Was a sufficient amount of data gathered? Were the data of sufficient depth and richness?

Procedures         ?             Were data collection and recording procedures adequately described and do they appear appropriate?

Procedures cont.             ?             Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias or behavioral distortions? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?

Enhancement of trustworthiness             ?             Did the researchers use effective strategies to enhance the trustworthiness/integrity of the study, and was there a good description of those strategies?

?             Were the methods used to enhance trustworthiness adequate?

?             Did the researcher document research procedures and decision processes sufficiently that findings are auditable and confirmable?

?             Was there evidence of researcher reflexivity?

?             Was there “thick description” of the context, participants, and findings, and was it at a sufficient level to support transferability?

RESULTS

Data analysis     

?             Were the data management and data analysis methods adequately described?

?             Was the data analysis strategy compatible with the research tradition and with the nature and type of data gathered?

?             Did the analysis yield an appropriate “product” (e.g., a theory, taxonomy, thematic pattern)?

?             Did the analytic procedures suggest the possibility of biases?

Findings               ?             Were the findings effectively summarized, with good use of excerpts and supporting arguments?

?             Did the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data? Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?

?             Did the analysis yield an insightful, provocative, authentic, and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?

Theoretical integration  ?             Were the themes or patterns logically connected to each other to form a convincing and integrated whole?

?             Were figures, maps, or models used effectively to summarize conceptualizations?

Theoretical integration cont.       ?             If a conceptual framework or ideologic orientation guided the study, were the themes or patterns linked to it in a cogent manner?

DISCUSSION

Interpretation of the findings    

?             Were the findings interpreted within an appropriate social or cultural context?

?             Were major findings interpreted and discussed within the context of prior studies?

?             Were the interpretations consistent with the study’s limitations?

Implications/recom mendations               ?             Did the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further research—and are those implications reasonable and complete?

GENERAL ISSUES

Presentation     

?             Was the report well-written, well-organized, and sufficiently detailed for critical analysis?

?             Was the description of the methods, findings, and interpretations sufficiently rich and vivid?

Researcher credibility    ?             Do the researchers’ clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?

Summary assessment    ?             Do the study findings appear to be trustworthy—do you have confidence in the truth value of the results?

?             Does the study contribute any meaningful evidence that can be used in nursing practice or that is useful to the nursing discipline?

Dot Image
joyfull Posted By :
Questions: 3914 Tutorials: 3810
Tutorials for this Question

Norwich NR593 Week 8 Assignment Latest 2021 March

Tutorial # 00621463
Posted On: 03/26/2021 04:46 AM
Feedback Score: 100% (by 1 users)
Purchased By: 3
joyfull
Posted By:
Questions:
3914
Tutorials:
3810
Report this Tutorial as Inappropriate
Tutorial Preview
The solution of Norwich NR593 Week 8 Assignment Latest 2021 March...
Update History
  • New attachment added: Week_08_Assignment_Qualitative_Research_Article_Critique.docx (05/14/2021 10:43 AM)
  • Attachments
    Week_08_Assignment_Qualitative_Research_Article_Critique.docx (27.74 KB)
    Recent Feedback
    Rated By Feedback Comments Rated On
    Good-quality and satisfactory content 11/26/2021

    Great! We have found the solution of this question!

    Related Questions
    Norwich NR593 Week 10 Discussion Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 10 Discussion Discuss your finalized ideas for your research proposal. Include approach, methodology, funding, team members, …
    Norwich NR593 Week 7 Discussion Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 7 Discussion Take the research problem you have chosen and discuss how it could be studied using a qualitative approach. Who wou …
    Norwich NR593 Week 1 Discussion Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 1 Discussion After reading the articles by Crable et al., and Stevens in your reading list and Ch 12 in your McEwen and Wills te …
    Norwich NR593 Week 2 Discussion Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 2 Discussion Define a clinical problem in your area that you would like to research. Find five current (last 5-7 years) resea …
    Norwich NR593 Week 9 Discussion Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 9 Discussion Take the research problem you have chosen and discuss how it could be studied as a quality improvement project. …
    Norwich NR593 Week 5 Discussion Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 5 Discussion Take the research problem you have chosen and discuss how it could be studied using a quantitative approach. Discus …
    Norwich NR593 Week 11 Discussion Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 11 Discussion Post your poster presentation by Wednesday. Choose two presentations of your classmates to constructively criti …
    Norwich NR593 Week 4 Discussion Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 4 Discussion Identify a problem in your clinical area. Choose a study from your research article search for your annotated bibli …
    Norwich NR593 Discussions Latest 2021 March (Full)
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 1 Discussion After reading the articles by Crable et al., and Stevens in your reading list and Ch 12 in your McEwen and Wills te …
    Norwich NR593 Week 11 Assignment Latest 2021 March
    NR593 Advanced Nursing Research and Evidence-Based Practice Week 11 Assignment   Research Presentation Poster Design a Poster Presentation of a research study as a set of slides. Here …
    Recent Questions
    ETHC445 Week 2 Assignment Religion and Ethics Latest 2024
    ETHC445 Week 2 Assignment Religion and Ethics Assignment Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapters 3, 4 Lesson Minimum of 2 sch …
    ETHC445 Week 1 Assignment Cultural Relativism and Moral Action Latest 2024
    ETHC445 Week 1 Assignment   Cultural Relativism and Moral Action Assignment Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: Textbook: Chapter 1, 2 …
    Social work process evalution - Agency Context: Briefly describe
    Social work process evalution The purpose of this assignment is to prepare a proposal for a process or outcome evaluation thatcould be implemented at your placement or place of employment (if you w …
    Psychology - Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers by Robert Sapolsky
    Psychology Question Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to increase your knowledge of health psychology concepts beyond the textbook. It also designed to utilize your critical thinking ski …
    PSY605 ITESM Erickson's Late Adulthood Analytical Review
    PSY 605 ITESM Erickson's Late Adulthood Analytical Review PSY 605 FINAL Integrating the Field of Developmental Psychology: A Review of the Literature Prior to beginning work on this assig …
    PSY225 - Survey, What were your five highest strengths
    psy/225 survey, What were your five highest strengths Take the VIA© survey. Using your results, write a 350- to 700-word paper covering the following points: What were …
    Ashford PSY699 Resources for the Integrative Literature Review
    PSY699 Ashford University Resources for the Integrative Literature Review Prior to beginning work on this written assignment, be sure to carefully review the instructions for the Final Assignment, …
    PSY630 Variations in Drug Response - Ms. Jones is a 30-year-old
    Variations in Drug Response PSY630 Using the knowledge you gained from the readings, evaluate how a typical drug, when orally administered, may be handled differently by these two patients: …
    Technology is ubiquitous; it is everywhere. Since humans
    provide insights into how technology has changed the way people interact Technology is ubiquitous; it is everywhere. Since humans are social creatures that need to interact, cell phones and social …
    SOC401 - A strong cover letter is an accompaniment
    SOC401 Crafting the Cover Letter A strong cover letter is an accompaniment to a strong résumé and is often the key to securing an interview. While a resume goes through ATS programs, …