Williams Machine Tool Company - For 85 years, the Williams

Question # 00651745
Subject: Business
Due on: 01/05/2024
Posted On: 01/05/2024 12:20 AM
Tutorials: 1
Rating:
4.9/5
Question Dot Image

Williams Machine Tool Company case study

WILLIAMS MACHINE TOOL COMPANY

For 85 years, the Williams Machine Tool Company had provided high-quality products to its clients, becoming the third largest U.S.-based machine tool company by 1990. The company was highly profitable and had an extremely low employee turnover rate. Pay and benefits were excellent. Between 1980 and 1990, the company's profits soared to record levels. The company's success was due to one product line of standard manufacturing machine tools. Williams spent most of its time and effort looking for ways to improve its bread-and-butter product line rather than to develop new products. The product line was so successful that companies were willing to modify their production lines around these machine tools rather than asking Williams for major modifications to the machine tools. By 1990, Williams Company was extremely complacent, expecting this phenomenal success with one product line to continue for 20 to 25 more years. The recession of the early 1990s forced management to realign their thinking. Cutbacks in production had decreased the demand for the standard machine tools. More and more customers were asking for either major modifications to the standard machine tools or a completely new product design. The marketplace was changing and senior management recognized that a new strategic focus was necessary. However, lower-level management and the work force, especially engineering, were strongly resisting a change. The employees, many of them with over 20 years of employment at Williams Company, refused to recognize the need for this change in the belief that the glory days of yore would return at the end of the recession. By 1995, the recession had been over for at least two years yet Williams Company had no new product lines. Revenue was down, sales for the standard product (with and without modifications) were decreasing, and the employees were still resisting change. Layoffs were imminent. In 1996, the company was sold to Crock Engineering. Crock had an experienced machine tool division of its own and understood the machine tool business. Williams Company was allowed to operate as a separate entity from 1995 to 1996. By 1996, red ink had appeared on the Williams Company balance sheet. Crock replaced all of the Williams senior managers with its own personnel. Crock then announced to all employees that Williams would become a specialty machine tool manufacturer and that the "good old days” would never return. Customer demand for specialty products had increased threefold in just the last twelve months alone. Crock made it clear that employees who would not support this new direction would be replaced. The new senior management at Williams Company recognized that 85 years of traditional management had come to an end for a company now committed to specialty products. The company culture was about to change, spearheaded by project management, concurrent engineering, and total quality management. Senior management's commitment to product management was apparent by the time and money spent in educating the employees. Unfortunately, the seasoned 20-year- plus veterans still would not support the new culture. Recognizing the problems, management provided continuous and visible support for project management in addition to hiring a project management consultant to work with the people. The consultant worked with Williams from 1996 to 2001. From 1996 to 2001, the Williams Division of Crock Engineering experienced losses in 24 consecutive quarters. The quarter ending March 31, 2002, was the first profitable quarter in over six years. Much of the credit was given to the performance and maturity of the project management system. In May 2002, the Williams Division was sold. More than 80% of the employees lost their jobs when the company was relocated over 1,500 miles away.

QUESTIONS

1. Why was it so difficult to change the culture of the company?

2. What could have been done differently to accelerate the change?

Dot Image
Getsolution Posted By :
Questions: 15503 Tutorials: 15502
Tutorials for this Question

Williams Machine Tool Company - For 85 years, the Williams

Tutorial # 00650636
Posted On: 01/05/2024 12:21 AM
Feedback Score: Not rated yet!
Purchased By: 2
Getsolution
Posted By:
Questions:
15503
Tutorials:
15502
Report this Tutorial as Inappropriate
Tutorial Preview
The solution of Williams Machine Tool Company - For 85 years, the Williams...
Attachments
Williams_Machine_Tool_Company_-_For_85_years,_the_Williams.ZIP (18.96 KB)

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Related Questions
Probabilities Fault Tree Analysis - What are the practical difficulties
Probabilities Fault Tree Analysis: What are the practical difficulties in determining the probabilities of failure for data used in Fault Tree Analysis? How do companies calculate this data and …
Strayer BUS520 Week 6 Assignment Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 6 Assignment Professional Development Program Proposal Overview As a manager of the department, you reviewed the sales report, and sales are dras …
Strayer BUS520 Week 4 Assignment Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 4 Assignment Organizational Issues and Solutions Overview Leaders address issues and propose solutions. As a leader, you'll need to stay on t …
Strayer BUS520 Week 3 Assignment Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 3 Assignment Organizational Overview Overview You will research the organization you selected in the Week 2 activity and present your analysis an …
Strayer BUS520 Week 6 Discussion Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 6 Discussion -Leadership Skills Post a Response Leadership is the ability to influence others to achieve organizational goals. Organizations spen …
Strayer BUS520 Week 5 Discussion Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 5 Discussion Teamwork Makes the Dream Work We have all worked in a group or team at some point in our careers. A team is brought together to achieve …
Strayer BUS520 Week 4 Discussion Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 4 Discussion Motivation Methods Motivation is the psychological process that arouses and directs behavior. There are six important theories that wil …
Strayer BUS520 Week 3 Discussion Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 3 Discussion Emotional Intelligence and Job Satisfaction Daniel Goleman, a psychologist, was the first to popularize the trait of emotional intellig …
Strayer BUS520 Week 2 Discussion Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 2 Discussion  Difficult Decisions Organizations, from time to time, must make hard decisions (expand, lay off employees, or close a facility). …
Strayer BUS520 Week 1 Discussion Latest 2024
BUS520 Leadership & Org Behavior Week 1 Discussion Organizational Behavior Introduce yourself to your peers by sharing something unique about your background. Explain how you expect this …
Recent Questions
Walden HLTH6475 Complete Course Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 1 Discussion INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY VERSUS VICTIM BLAMING IN HEALTH PROMOTION Part of what makes a discussion a discussion and not a lectur …
Walden HLTH6475 All Quizzes Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 1 Quiz Question 1 Which factors have been found to influence behavior? Socioeconomic Status Skills Culture Attitude Gender A …
Walden HLTH6475 Module 6 Quiz Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 6 Quiz Question 1 Which method allows study participants to tell their stories?  Observations In-depth individual interview &nbs …
Walden HLTH6475 Module 5 Quiz Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 5 Quiz Question 1 What alternative term has been suggested recently for hard-to-reach? Marginalized Inaccessible Hard to access Ha …
Walden HLTH6475 Module 4 Quiz Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 4 Quiz Question 1 Outreach workers from the CeaseFire program spent a total of 500 combined hours with program participants during the first y …
Walden HLTH6475 Module 3 Quiz Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 3 Quiz Question 1 Which of the following is the construct of the Theory of Reasoned Action that explains behavior based on what we think other …
Walden HLTH6475 Module 2 Quiz Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 2 Quiz Question 1 If the program is aimed at a true population, the term is called ______________. Intended population Intended audience …
Walden HLTH6475 All Assignments Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 2 Assignment LANNING MODELS ARTICLE REVIEW The published literature is rich with examples of health promotion programs that have utilized the …
Walden HLTH6475 Module 6 Assignment Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 6 Assignment EVALUATION PLAN Once the program has been designed, it is time to consider how the program will be evaluated. To design an evalu …
Walden HLTH6475 Module 5 Assignment Latest 2024
HLTH6475 Prgm Plan, Implement & Eval Module 5 Assignment  DEVELOPING EVALUATION QUESTIONS Evaluation takes place at various points within a program's life cycle. It requires di …